Jump to content

Talk:SCP: Secret Laboratory

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contested deletion

[edit]

This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because... (your reason here) --Aevann (talk) 14:59, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I removed copyrighted text.

I AM NOT A EMPLOYEE OF NORTHWOOD STUDIOS!!!! Guys i am not I just like the game and like editing wikipedia! --AndrewMidkiff (talk) 19:21, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Edits

[edit]

I've rewritten much of the article to better comply with various sourcing and manual of style requirements. The content is honestly pretty sparse, but with the available sourcing this is about as good as we are going to get. Spirit of Eagle (talk) 02:25, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

SCP list section should include the SCPs titles.

[edit]

It should have their titles and details about how they work in-game.169.244.116.71 (talk) 13:35, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

added cleanup tag

[edit]

I can't remember what the specific term is, but this article has a lot of information that I'm pretty sure is too specific and listy to be anywhere but a Fandom wiki. casualdejekyll (talk) 15:11, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

SCP 173 has not been updated yet.

[edit]

The recent edit describing 173 is wrong. I will change this soon. Please do not change it back. Porinc (talk) 20:40, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup

[edit]

Soooo I'm new, I like this game, but after reading Wikipedia for a long time I want to say that this article is a bit of a mess and I'm not sure whether or not it even qualifies as relevant enough. I'm thinking of rewriting a few sections, can anybody check in when I'm done? — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheKidWhoEdits (talkcontribs) 14:14, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Attempts at improving the article

[edit]

1. The Description is like 90% of the article. I think it should be shortened.

2. The other sections need more info in them.

Some sources:

-- MrRhino683 (Talk) 14:19, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Potential Source for "Roles" Section

[edit]

Roles section needs a lot of work, if it's even necessary at all. But there's basically no form of reliable source on it; best I could find is this article but I'm not going to try and interpret it.

TheKidWhoEdits (talk) 15:34, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]